Archive
Chip’s Blog - BusinessWeek Hit by SQL Injection Attack
North American Insurance IT Spending In 2008
On Gartner’s Magic Quadrant for Identity Management
You might be interested in having a look at Gartner's Magic Quadrants for Identity Management. In particular, a recent article (15 August 2008) published by Earl Perkins and Perry Carpenter focused on the "Magic Quadrant for User Provisioning":
"User provisioning delivers capabilities to manage users' identities across systems, applications and resources. Driven by compliance (security effectiveness) and security efficiency, the market is maturing, but identity governance and role-based access concerns raise new issues for customers."
On one hand this kind of reports provides good insights about the current state of the art (in this case about user provisioning). On the other hand, some criticisms have been given about the overall evaluation of current IdM solutions and their positioning in the "magic quadrant". For example, have a look at this article by Dave Kearns.
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Confessions Of A QSA: The Inside Story Of PCI Compliance
Market Overview: Client Security
The Forrester Wave(tm): Network Access Control, Q3 2008
Part II: Risk Management for Unstructured Data in Enterprises
In a recent post published on the Netweaver Identity Manager Weblog, the author has made a few comments about my post on "Risk Management for Unstructured Data in Enterprises" (well, actually the published URL to my post is apparently broken ...).
Thanks for this input, in particular about three main points that I (tried to) summarise as it follows:
1) Meaning of unstructured data (or the fact that unstructured data does not exist by definition ...)
2) Narrowness of perception of approaches and incompleteness of my list of required solutions
3) Availability of comprehensive methodology for implementing enterprise wide risk management
About point 1), this looks pretty much a philosophical discussion. No doubt that, at the end, we talk about information that has some sort of structure (well, an email has a header, a body with some texts and attachments; a document is made of paragraphs or lines of text; ...). However, the (maybe over-hyped) "unstructured data" term is currently used to (a) identify specific types of information and (b) contrast it against classic "structured data" (e.g. information stored in RDBMS repositories, etc.). I think I will stick with this terminology ...
Back to the key point, recent reports (including the Ponemon Institute's survey on "Governance of Unstructured Data" and other market and research reports) indeed highlight that the management of unstructured data in enterprises is a raising concern for enterprises, both in terms of governance and risk management. I think this is what really matters - independently from the terminology.
No doubt that classification of data is an important point, especially if you ever manage to "find" where this "unstructured data" is, within a complex enterprise environment ... I would say that, given the particular nature of "unstructured data", a preliminary "data discovery" phase might be required, indeed followed by a classification and assessment of its value (considering though, that the value of some of this information might also come from aggregations and correlations ...).
About point 2), by no means my post was meant to provide a definitive or comprehensive assessment and answer to the problem of information risk management or, more specifically, on "unstructured" information risk management. It was just a statement of some "desirable" properties and capabilities that I would like to see (and I know it would be of some help to customers ...).
I am well aware of the complexity of the overall (security) "enterprise risk assessment and management" problem, its extent and the fact that, when assessing and managing (security) risks, many factors are involved, including business goals, IT, other assets, people, processes, awareness/education, etc.
(Security) risk assessment and management techniques/methodologies/frameworks and standards/etc. are indeed out there (e.g. ISO 27005/2700x, CoBIT, etc.). These "standards" provide guidelines and criteria to be carefully refined, grounded and contextualized in various "operational" realities, along with some good, common sense ...
So, no doubt that there are already "comprehensive methodology for implementing enterprise wide risk management", at least from a consulting perspective, but this was not my main point.
My main point was not so focused on these methodologies but rather on the need to better understand and possibly improve the process of exploring, explaining and predicting the consequences and impacts of strategic (policy) choices and decisions in enterprise contexts and environments, in particular when dealing with security matters.
An approach that we are currently exploring is based on modeling and simulation techniques in the security field, coupled with economic theory and social science. Please have a look at the HPL Technical Report on "Identity Analytics" that I mentioned a few times - to see what I mean, in more details (at least from an "IdM perspective").
Specifically, one of my R&D interests is in "(semi-) automation" tools and solutions in this space that can indeed help and support professional and consulting services in their risk assessment & management activities. This includes providing decision support and "what-if analysis", involving modeling and simulation, providing trade-off analysis, etc.
Given the complexity of this space, I deliberately focused on the aspect of "management of unstructured data" and the IdM perspective, well conscious this is just a part of the overall problem and space.
I hope I clarified this point.
About point 3), no doubt about this, as I mentioned above.
However the statement that "comprehensive methodology for implementing enterprise wide risk management is done" sounds (at least to me) sounds a little bit abstract to me ...
It would be of some interest to the readers of this blog if this statement could be elaborated (specifically in the space of IdM and information management) along with providing some recommendations/input/directions (hopefully beyond having to hire a consulting company ...:-)).
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Risk Management for Unstructured Data in Enterprises
In the context of the HP Labs' Security and Identity Analytics project I have been investigating the implications of "unstructured data" (i.e. emails, documents, multimedia files, pages in data sharing sites, messages exchanged with Instant Messaging tools, blog posts, data mash-ups, etc.) within organizations, along with how to explain and predict involved risks and explore the consequences of related security (policy) choices.
Is "unstructured data" really a problem for organizations? If so, where is this problem? Well, the content of unstructured data (and/or an aggregation of it) can be confidential as it might include personal, financial and business-critical information. Because of the nature of unstructured data (and associated, emerging tools to handle and share it), there are many ways this data could leak and/or be misused, ranging from accidental disclosures to aggregations of information posted in public areas.
The threat landscape (including threats to data confidentiality, integrity and availability) is potentially broad as many contextual elements, IT components, processes and behavioral aspects are involved.
Most of the current approaches (I am aware of), that mitigate some of the involved risks, are based on traditional IT security and identity "control points" (such as access control, interception points, complex document lifecycle management tools, etc.), addressing "point problems".
I believe this is not enough. Solutions are required to help organizations (and decision makers) to: (1) fully understand the nature of the problem, based on their specific context and environment; (2) have a picture of their overall risk exposure; (3) make informed decisions on which approaches to follow, explain and predict the consequences and define appropriate policies; (3) explore trade-offs.
So far I have found no comprehensive approach/solution providing these features. Is anybody aware of any?
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Is Green IT Your Emperor With No Clothes?
Case Study: North American Manufacturer Links IT Controls To Business Impacts
Case Study: North American Financial Institution Relies On Self-Assessments
Sourcing Professionals Must Analyze And Manage Risk Across The Global Supply Chain
Coming Digital ID World Conference 2008, 8-10 September 2008
The Digital ID World Conference 2008 is going to take place in Anaheim, California on 8-10 September 2008. A complete agenda is available online. Some of the Keynotes include:
- Identity Assurance: A Backbone for the Identity Marketplace, Peter Alterman, Assistant CIO for E-Authentication and Chair, US Federal PKI Policy Authority, National Institutes of Health; Andrew Nash, Senior Director, Information and Risk Management, PayPal; Frank Villavicencio, Director, Citigroup
- Making Identity Work End to End, Craig Wittenberg, Architect, Microsoft
- State of the Industry, Jamie Lewis, CEO & Research Chair, Burton Group
- Have I Seen You Before? An Industry Discussion About User-Centric Identity, Kim Cameron, Chief Architect of Identity, Microsoft
- On VRM and Identity, Doc Searls, Fellow, Berkman Center, Harvard Law School
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Complex Event Processing In A Quant World
New UK TSB Project: Developing the Next Generation of Identity Management Systems
As announced by this article, a new UK government-founded project is going to start in October, aiming at developing the next generation of identity management systems:
"A research project will see a team of experts team up for three years to develop the next generation of identity management systems.
The government-funded project will launch in October and will include academics from Cranfield University, Royal Holloway University of London, Salford University, Consult Hyperion and Sunderland City Council.
The research team will look at topics of privacy and consent for identity management, with the aim of helping people and organisations make well-informed judgements about their choice of online services, how they use them, and what information they give out.
"There is a concern that people aren't really clear about the value of their unique identity," said Debi Ashenden, Cranfield's lead researcher. "Our research will engage people in current debates about privacy and consent issues, find out how they think about their identity and what decisions they make. We hope the discussions will provide invaluable information to help develop new identity management tools."
The funding for the project is part of a £5.5m investment by the Technology Strategy Board (TSB), Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), and Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Two other identity management related projects will also be funded by the investment.
Andrew Tyrer, the TSB's lead for its network security innovation platform said this research will be key to "ensuring that the hardware and software required will meet public expectations about these important issues"."
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Financial Services Of The Future: Collaborative Competition Will Be The Norm
An Essential Guide to Identity Management for IT Professionals
Ian Grant has recently published an article on ComputerWeekly.com, called "Identity Management: An Essential Guide for IT Professionals".
It is actually an overview of some IdM initiatives and related aspects (thanks for mentioning my blog when referring to HP's initiatives in the IdM space).
Is anybody aware of an online "Complete and Up-to-Date" Guide to Identity Management and various related initiatives?
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Securing Virtual Server Environments
Securing Virtual Server Environments
Road Map: How GeSI’s “SMART” Report Broadens The IT Industry’s Green Agenda
What Are The Hot Roles In IT?
How Green Are You?
Chip’s Blog - New SQL Injection Worm Targeting MSSQL
Chip’s Blog - New SQL Injection Worm Targeting MSSQL
Threat Alert: Wireless Is The New Internet
Teleconference: Improving Business Continuity Management: Case Studies From Organizations That Have Adopted BS 25999
Vendor Snapshot: Illuminate Solutions Breaks Through Traditional BI Barriers
Updated Security Alert for CVE-2008-3257 Issued
Firefox and 50 add-ons for Private and Secure Web Surfing
A recent article by Laura Milligan, called "50 Firefox add-ons to achieve private and secure web surfing" provides a comprehensive list of add-ons for Firefox to achieve degreees of security and privacy whilst surfing the web:
"Firefox is generally considered a secure web browser, but if you're interested in keeping your activity on certain websites private or giving yourself extra protection against phishing, hackers and viruses, you may want to consider beefing up your Firefox's security in general. Thankfully, there are lots of options available that make achieving privacy and security online as easy as downloading a simple add-on or application that was designed just for Firefox users."
This article classifies these 50 add-ons (and provides links for each of them) in the following categories: Secrecy and Encryption; add-ons that beef-up security; cookies; testing your system; passwords; protect your privacy online.
Have you had any direct experience using these add-ons? Are they up to their promises?
--- NOTE: use this mirror blog if you prefer posting on an external blog site ---
Recent Comments